25 Sep 2014

Russia’s Punitive Trade Policy Measures towards Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia

Denis Cenusa / Michael Emerson / Tamara Kovziridze / Veronika Movchan

0
Download Publication

6493 Downloads

While EU and US sanctions against Russia over its aggression in Ukraine, and Russia’s counter-sanctions, are much discussed due to their evident political significance, less attention has been given to Russia’s punitive sanctions against the three Eastern European states – Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia – that have signed with the EU Association Agreements (AA), which include Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) provisions. This paper therefore documents these trade policy restrictions and embargoes imposed by Russia, and provides some first indications of their impact. The immediate impact on trade flows, especially for agri-food products, has been substantial, albeit with some leakage through Belarus. The main instrument for the Russian measures has been allegations of non-conformity with Russian technical standards, although the correlation of these allegations with movements in Russia’s geopolitical postures makes it obvious that the Russian technical agencies are following political guidelines dressed up as scientific evidence. These measures also push the three states into diversifying their trade marketing efforts in favour of the EU and other world markets, with Georgia already having taken significant steps in this direction, since in its case the Russian sanctions date back to 2006. In the case of Ukraine, Russia’s threat to cancel CIS free trade preferences infiltrated trilateral talks between the EU, Ukraine and Russia, leading on 12 September to their proposed postponement until the end of 2015 of the ‘provisional’ implementation of a large part of the AA/DCFTA. This was immediately followed on 16 September by ratification of the AA/DCFTA by both the Rada in Kyiv and the European Parliament, which will lead to its full and definitive entry into force when the 28 EU member states have also ratified it. However Putin followed the day after with a letter to Poroshenko making an abusive interpretation of the 12 September understanding.

Denis Cenusa is Associated Expert at Expert-Grup, Chisinau; Michael Emerson is Associate Senior Research Fellow at CEPS, Brussels; Tamara Kovziridse is Professor at the Free University of Tbilisi; Veronika Movchan is Academic Director at the Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting (IER), Kyiv.

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

The end of an era

The Polish Constitutional Court’s judgment on the primacy of EU law and its effects on mutual trust

Deepening EU-Moldovan Relations

Updating and upgrading in the shadow of Covid-19 Third edition

Deepening EU-Ukrainian Relations

Updating and upgrading in the shadow of Covid-19 Third edition

Deepening EU-Georgian Relations

Updating and upgrading in the shadow of Covid-19 Third edition

Barriers and enablers for implementing circular economy business models

Evidence from the electrical and electronic equipment and agri-food value chains

A tale of two prices

What higher energy costs and the ETS price mean for a just transition