10 Sep 2021

Public investment or fiscal consolidation after Covid-19?

The extreme case of Italy and Germany’s recovery and resilience plans

Daniel Gros / Francesco Corti / Pietro Regazzoni

Download Publication


With the onset of the Covid-19 crisis, the debate on fiscal policies and the role of deficits in supporting growth has been completely revamped. Through its unprecedented recovery programme, all EU member states have developed comprehensive Recovery and Resilience plans (NRRPs) that will allow them to positively make use of billions of euros worth of economic support to build back stronger after the pandemic. This analysis compares the NRRPs of Germany and Italy, two countries that have very different views and priorities on how their allocation of the recovery funds should be spent and invested over the short, medium and long-term. This paper is a continuation of the CEPS series of assessments of national plans’ structural reforms and forms part of the CEPS Recovery and Resilience Reflection Project.

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

The European added value of the Recovery and Resilience Facility

An assessment of the Austrian, Belgian and German plans

Where the (euro) buck stops

Facing the next big crisis with a better EU budget

The Next Revision of the Financial Regulation and the EU Budget Galaxy

How to safeguard and strengthen budgetary principles and parliamentary oversight

Optimal tariff versus optimal sanction

The case of European gas imports from Russia

Comparing and assessing recovery and resilience plans – Second edition

Italy, Germany, Spain, France, Portugal, Slovakia, Austria and Belgium

When the taps are turned off

How to get Europe through the next winter without Russian gas

Managing sovereign debts held by the ESCB

Operational and legal constraints