CEPS © 2019

Banking fragility rooted in justice failures Evidence from Ukraine
Policy Contribution

Towards ‘EuroNest 2.0’: What should the next European Parliament learn from its predecessor?

by Hrant Kostanyan / Bruno Vandecasteele
01 October 2013

Towards ‘EuroNest 2.0’: What should the next European Parliament learn from its predecessor?

Hrant Kostanyan / Bruno Vandecasteele

The development and functioning of the EU-Eastern Partnership Parliamentary Assembly (EuroNest PA) is the focus of this Policy Brief, in which the authors argue that despite organising a number of meetings and adopting several resolutions in the past two years, the Assembly is failing to reach its objectives of promoting economic and political integration between the EU and the Eastern Partners. Three main problems are considered in this paper: i) the criticism of the European Parliament for being inconsistent about the conditions under which countries can send delegates ii) the fact that the parliamentary meetings are too short and infrequent, and iii) the observation that the Eastern Partners focus too much on national and bilateral issues, thus failing to engage in multilateral dialogue. A number of recommendations are put forward to enhance the effectiveness of the Assembly.

Hrant Kostanyan is an Associate Research Fellow at CEPS Bruno Vandecasteele is a PhD candidate at the Centre for EU Studies (CEUS), Ghent University.


About the Authors


  • Author
    Hrant Kostanyan
    Hrant Kostanyan
  • Author
    Bruno Vandecasteele
    Bruno Vandecasteele
Towards ‘EuroNest 2.0’: What should the next European Parliament learn from its predecessor?
Download Publication

1397 Downloads