25 Oct 2021

The end of an era

The Polish Constitutional Court’s judgment on the primacy of EU law and its effects on mutual trust

Petra Bárd / Adam Bodnar

Download Publication


On 7 October 2021 the Polish Constitutional Court delivered its judgment in case K3/21, holding that the basic foundations of European integration, such as the primacy of EU law and the EU understanding of judicial independence, were contrary to the Polish Constitution. This paper explores the consequences of the ruling for the European project, with a special emphasis on the principles of mutual trust and mutual recognition in criminal cases. Contrary to what some academics believe, the judgment is short of a notification of intent to withdraw from the EU under Article 50 TEU. But it does have very serious implications beyond the borders of Poland for the common European project, and marks the end of judicial cooperation in the area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ). EU institutions still try to uphold the semblance that specific judges were independent in the Polish anti-constitutional setting and force member states’ judges to cooperate. But such an approach risks violating fundamental rights, especially the right to a fair trial. This in turn forces national courts to either disregard EU law, or compromise on fundamental rights and get into an open conflict with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The only way to resolve this tension is to openly acknowledge the end of the era of mutual trust and suspend mutual recognition-based laws.

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

The EU grants temporary protection for people fleeing war in Ukraine

Time to rethink unequal solidarity in EU asylum policy

European Union Policies on Onward and Secondary Movements of Asylum-seekers and Refugees

A Critical Overview of the EU’s Migration Management Complex

Limitations on Human Mobility in Response to COVID-19

A preliminary mapping and assessment of national and EU policy measures, their sanctioning frameworks, implementation tools and enforcement practices

Between politics and inconvenient evidence

Assessing the Renewed EU Action Plan against migrant smuggling

Walling off Responsibility?

The Pushbacks at the EU’s External Borders with Belarus

Managed Expectations

EU Member States’ Views on the Conference on the Future of Europe

Cross-border data access in criminal proceedings and the future of digital justice

Navigating the current legal framework and exploring ways forward within the EU and across the Atlantic