12 Jun 2015

The QE Placebo

Daniel Gros

0
Download Publication

2292 Downloads

After pointing out several surprising coincidences and contradictions that arise in nearly every aspect of the QE debate, Daniel Gros arrives at the conclusion in this CEPS Commentary that evaluating the policy’s effectiveness is more of an art than a science, which leaves plenty of room for distortion and bias.

Daniel Gros is Director of CEPS. This commentary was also published by Project Syndicate, 9 June 2015, and syndicated to newspapers and journals worldwide (http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/qe-ecb-bond-buying-program-by-daniel-gros-2015-06). It is republished here with the kind permission of Project Syndicate.

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

A renewed EU approach for Jobs and Skills

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

Competition Policy and State Aid: Defining a sustainable path for Europe’s recovery

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

The Digital Transition

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

Strategic Value Chains

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

European Green Deal

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

Basel III Finalisation

The impact on EU banks and the real economy across scenarios

Managed Expectations

EU Member States’ Views on the Conference on the Future of Europe

Digital labour platforms in the EU

Mapping and business models