01 Jul 2013

The Dutch wish-list for a lighter regulatory touch from the EU

Michael Emerson

Download Publication


The Dutch government set out the results of its review of EU competences on June 21st, under the slogan “European where necessary, national where possible”, claiming that the EU does not adequately respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. It published a list of 54 points for corrective action, which Michael Emerson assesses in this new CEPS Commentary. The political significance of this initiative is heightened because it comes alongside the UK's ongoing review of EU competences, although unlike the British, the Dutch make no mention of secession, treaty changes or repatriation of competences.

Michael Emerson is an Associate CEPS Senior Research Fellow.

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

Multi-Layered Actions?

Sustaining Partnerships in the EU Integrated Approach to Conflicts and Crises

The Recovery and Resilience Facility

A springboard for a renaissance of public investments in Europe?

Limitations on Human Mobility in Response to COVID-19

A preliminary mapping and assessment of national and EU policy measures, their sanctioning frameworks, implementation tools and enforcement practices

Central bank digital currencies

Can central banks succeed in the marketplace for digital monies?

EU defence projects

Balancing Member States, money and management

Between politics and inconvenient evidence

Assessing the Renewed EU Action Plan against migrant smuggling