24 May 2018

Does the euro area need a safe or a diversified asset?

Daniel Gros

0
Download Publication

1720 Downloads

Author: Daniel Gros

Key points for policy-makers

The banking system of the euro area can be stabilised even without creating a new ‘safe’ asset. The real problem is the concentration of risk on bank’s balance sheets in the form of large holdings of bonds of the home sovereign. Diversification should be the first priority. But the current regulatory framework hinders diversification of sovereign risk because existing investment funds of euro area government bonds are treated as if they were much less safe and liquid than the individual government bonds themselves.

On May 24th, the Commission proposed ‘enabling’ legislation for the creation of sovereign bond-backed securities (SBBS). Enabling SBBS is useful, but they require a new framework for the tranching involved, with no track record in markets. It is thus highly uncertain whether SBBS will be widely adopted. By contrast, the approach proposed in this contribution would rely on an existing globally recognised framework (e.g. the Luxembourg or Irish UCITS or electronic-traded funds – ETF), widely used by market participants today.

Policy recommendations

Regulators should treat regulated funds that invest only in euro-area government securities in the same way they treat the underlying government bonds. This applies in particular to two key issues: capital and liquidity requirements. As long as government bonds have a zero-risk weight (under the standard Basel approach), euro area banks should not have to hold any additional capital on funds based only on euro area government securities.

The same treatment should apply to the liquidity cover ratio (LCR), which obliges banks to hold a buffer of cash or liquid high-quality securities. Diversified funds of euro area government bonds should be put into the same liquidity category as government bonds themselves. Diversified funds of the debt of many countries have a more stable market value than even the safest individual country bond. They should thus become the preferred instrument to satisfy liquidity needs.

Funds that  contain euro area government bonds in proportion to the capital key in the ECB should be recognised as ‘diversified’ and should  be exempted from the large exposure limits.

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

A renewed EU approach for Jobs and Skills

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

Competition Policy and State Aid: Defining a sustainable path for Europe’s recovery

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

The Digital Transition

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

Strategic Value Chains

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

European Green Deal

Towards a Resilient and Sustainable Post-Pandemic Recovery Working Group Report of the New Industrial Strategy for Europe Task Force

Basel III Finalisation

The impact on EU banks and the real economy across scenarios

Managed Expectations

EU Member States’ Views on the Conference on the Future of Europe

Digital labour platforms in the EU

Mapping and business models