18 Dec 2017

Democracy and its Deficits

The path towards becoming European-style democracies in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine

Ghia Nodia / Denis Cenusa / Mikhail Minakov

Download Publication


Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine are three participating states of the European Partnership that have chosen to conclude Association Agreements with the European Union, often at the expense of relations with their most powerful neighbour, Russia. They are also rather similar in their levels of democratic development. Within a post-Soviet space, they stand out for their relatively high level of democratic freedoms and political pluralism; none of them, however, can be considered a consolidated democracy, and most analysts describe them as uncertain or hybrid political regimes that combine features of autocracy and democracy.

This paper offers a comparative analysis of the three countries’ political systems and aims to interpret both the roots of their relative success, and the nature of the deficits that prevent them from consolidating their democratic institutions. Among these deficits are problems stemming from ethnic, regional and cultural conflicts; strong and weak features in their general constitutional systems; the links between democratic development and government capacity to produce public goods; state capture (including control over the most influential media organisations) by powerful oligarchs and endemic corruption; underdevelopment of political parties and party systems; insufficient trust towards institutions of electoral democracy and a resulting propensity to use extra-constitutional means of political struggle. Civil society organisations have also failed penetrate the wider public and the anti-liberal discourse of traditionally dominant churches and anti-Western media and civil society groups is often supported by Russia.

Despite these structural challenges, the commitment to European values and norms demonstrated by societies in these three countries gives hope that they can eventually consolidate their democratic institutions. It is argued that closer ties to the EU are important in explaining their relatively high level of democratic development. For this reason, the consistent and enhanced commitment of the European Union to this region is crucial to their continued success in this area.

Ghia Nodia is Professor of Politics at Ilia State University, Tbilisi. Denis Cenusa is a Researcher and Programme Director at Expert-Grup, Chisinau. Mikhail Minakov is Professor, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kyiv.

This paper was originally prepared in the context of the 3 dcfta research and policy advice project supported by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). It is also available for free downloading on the 3dcfta website (http://www.3dcftas.eu/).

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

The EU accession prospects of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia

First responses to the conditions set by the European Commission

One year of war in Ukraine

Understanding what has happened and what needs to happen next

Europe after the War

Financial Cooperation for Pan-European, Euro-Mediterranean and EU-African Integration

The Impressive EU-Ukraine Summits

Alongside the Inadequate Enlargement Methodology

The $300 Billion Question

How to get Russia to pay for Ukraine’s reconstruction