10 Oct 2019

Crisis Responders

Comparing Policy Approaches of the EU, the UN, NATO and OSCE with Experiences in the Field

Loes Debuysere / Steven Blockmans

Download Publication


The EU aims at being a prominent global crisis responder but its Member States act also through the UN, NATO, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) to achieve both short-term stabilization by military and/or civilian means, as well as longer term conflict prevention and transformation. By comparing the policy approaches of these four multilateral organizations to conflicts and crises, this article shows how the broad principle of comprehensiveness has been developed to fit different institutional logics, thus leading to divergences in approach. Distilling findings from empirical research conducted in Afghanistan, Iraq, Kosovo, Libya, Mali and Ukraine, this article synthesizes lessons about varying levels of the EU’s and the other organizations’ conflict sensitivity, effective multilateralism, value-based approach and application of the principle of local ownership in theatre.

Reprinted from “European Foreign Affairs Review”, Volume 24, no.3 (2019): 243–264, with permission of Kluwer Law International. Permission to use this content must be obtained from the copyright owner.

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

Balkan and Eastern European Comparisons

Building a New Momentum for the European integration of the Balkan and Eastern European associated states

From self-doubt to self-assurance

The European External Action Service as the indispensable support for a geopolitical EU

Extraterritorial sanctions with a Chinese trademark

European responses to long-arm legal tactics

Arming instability

EU-Israel arms trade and the EU Common Position