29 Aug 2018

Towards a principled and trust-based partnership

Criminal Justice and Police Cooperation between the EU and the UK after Brexit

Sergio Carrera / Valsamis Mitsilegas / Marco Stefan / Fabio Giuffrida

0
Download Publication

4122 Downloads

Brexit poses major challenges for future interaction between the EU and the UK in the areas of criminal justice and police cooperation. A new legal framework will be required to sustain the EU’s relations with the UK – an active participant in numerous EU criminal justice and police cooperation instruments – once it leaves the Union. The negotiations on the exit of the UK from the EU must grapple with the crucial question of how and to what extent can the two parties continue to maintain effective arrangements for fighting cross-border crime, while at the same time guaranteeing compliance with the rule of law and fundamental rights.

This report is the result of intensive deliberations among members of a Task Force set up jointly by CEPS and the School of Law at Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), who met regularly throughout the first half of 2018. It examines the feasibility of retaining the current EU–UK framework for cooperation in these critical fields and explores possible alternatives to the status quo. It also delves into the conditions under which the UK could continue to participate in EU instruments and relevant EU agencies engaged in cooperation in criminal matters and to have access to justice and home affairs databases and other information-sharing tools. In their conclusions, the members offer a set of specific policy options for the EU and the UK to consider after Brexit with a view to developing an effective partnership in the areas of criminal justice and security based on trust and shared values.

The Task Force was co-chaired by Peter Hustinx, former European Data Protection Supervisor, and Michael Kennedy, Consultant and Adviser on national and international criminal justice issues and former Chief Operating Officer at the Crown Prosecution Service and former President of Eurojust. The final report was prepared by a team of four rapporteurs: Sergio Carrera, Senior Research Fellow and Head of the Justice and Home Affairs unit at CEPS and part-time Professor at the Migration Policy Centre, European University Institute in Florence; Valsamis Mitsilegas, Professor of European Criminal Law and Global Security and Head of the Department of Law, QMUL; Marco Stefan, Researcher in the Justice and Home Affairs unit at CEPS; and Fabio Giuffrida, PhD Candidate in EU Criminal Law, QMUL.

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

The EU grants temporary protection for people fleeing war in Ukraine

Time to rethink unequal solidarity in EU asylum policy

European Union Policies on Onward and Secondary Movements of Asylum-seekers and Refugees

A Critical Overview of the EU’s Migration Management Complex

Limitations on Human Mobility in Response to COVID-19

A preliminary mapping and assessment of national and EU policy measures, their sanctioning frameworks, implementation tools and enforcement practices

Between politics and inconvenient evidence

Assessing the Renewed EU Action Plan against migrant smuggling

Walling off Responsibility?

The Pushbacks at the EU’s External Borders with Belarus

The end of an era

The Polish Constitutional Court’s judgment on the primacy of EU law and its effects on mutual trust