CEPS © 2019

Ten years after EULEX Key principles for future EU flagship initiatives on the rule of law
Policy Contribution

To be in, or to be out: Reflections on the Danish referendum

by Catharina Sørensen
10 December 2015

To be in, or to be out: Reflections on the Danish referendum

Catharina Sørensen

Download Publication

4310 Downloads

Author: Catharina Sørensen

Series: EPIN Commentary No. 29     No of pp: 2

In this EPIN Commentary, Catharina Sørensen offers her reflections on Denmark’s referendum, held on December 3rd, on whether the country should change its blanket opt-out on all justice and home affairs cooperation in the EU to the more nuanced opt-in model adopted by the UK and Ireland. In her view, the outcome reflected the two separate ‘languages’ deployed in the public debate over the referendum – the emotional discussion about sovereignty, which appealed to the heart, and the technical argument about cooperation, which appealed to reason. In using these two languages, the campaigners spoke past one another, failed to understand each other and divided Denmark into two opposing camps.

Catharina Sørensen is head of research at Think Tank EUROPA in Copenhagen. 

About the Author


  • Author
    Catharina Sørensen
    Catharina Sørensen
To be in, or to be out: Reflections on the Danish referendum
Download Publication

4310 Downloads