08 Jul 2015

Access to Electronic Data by Third-Country Law Enforcement Authorities

Challenges to EU Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights

Sergio Carrera / Gloria González Fuster / Elspeth Guild / Valsamis Mitsilegas

0
Download Publication

7243 Downloads

This study examines the challenges to European law posed by third-country access to data held by private companies for purposes of law-enforcement investigations in criminal proceedings.  The proliferation of electronic communications is putting cloud-computing companies under severe strain from multiple demands from the authorities to acquire access to such data.

A key challenge for the EU emerges when third-country authorities request access to data held by private companies under EU jurisdiction outside pre-established channels of cooperation, in particular outside Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) treaties. The EU concluded an MLA agreement with the United States in 2003, which sets out the rules and procedures for lawful and legitimate access to evidence. A key distinguishing feature of the MLA-led process is that any request for access to data is ‘mediated’ by or requires the consent of the state authority to whom the request is submitted as well as scrutiny by an independent judicial authority.

Special focus is given in this study to the practical issues emerging in EU-US relations covering mutual legal assistance and evidence-gathering for law enforcement purposes in criminal proceedings. The fundamental question guiding this enquiry is: How best to ensure that the rule of law and trust-based methods are respected in these proceedings?

In conducting this study, the authors carried out a detailed survey of the main EU legal instruments and their standards, underlining their direct relevance for assessing the lawfulness and legitimacy of access to data. They then outline three possible scenarios for the future and put forward a set of policy recommendations for addressing these challenges.

Sergio Carrera is Senior Research Fellow and Head of the Justice and Home Affairs section at the Centre for European Policy Studies and Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law of the University of Maastricht. Gloria González Fuster is a Research Professor at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). Elspeth Guild is Senior Associate Research Fellow at CEPS, Jean Monnet Professor ad personam of European immigration law at Radboud University Nijmegen and Queen Mary University of London. Valsamis Mitsilegas is Head of the Department of Law and Professor of European Criminal Law at Queen Mary University of London.

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

A transformational moment?

The EU's response to Russia's war in Ukraine

The EU grants temporary protection for people fleeing war in Ukraine

Time to rethink unequal solidarity in EU asylum policy

European Union Policies on Onward and Secondary Movements of Asylum-seekers and Refugees

A Critical Overview of the EU’s Migration Management Complex

Limitations on Human Mobility in Response to COVID-19

A preliminary mapping and assessment of national and EU policy measures, their sanctioning frameworks, implementation tools and enforcement practices

Between politics and inconvenient evidence

Assessing the Renewed EU Action Plan against migrant smuggling

Walling off Responsibility?

The Pushbacks at the EU’s External Borders with Belarus

The end of an era

The Polish Constitutional Court’s judgment on the primacy of EU law and its effects on mutual trust