Saturday | 19 Sep 2020
21 Jan 2019

An Appraisal of the European Commission of Crisis

Sergio Carrera

0
Download Publication

1437 Downloads

Has the Juncker Commission delivered a “new start” for EU Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) policies? This book examines the question in relation to the performance of the European Commission’s intra-institutional setting while taking stock of the most relevant legislative developments and acts in the EU Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) from 2014 up to the end of 2018. These developments are critically assessed in view of the rule of law and fundamental rights standards enshrined in the Treaties and the EU’s Better Regulation commitments. The book argues that this has been the Commission of crisis and that the ‘politics of crisis’ have not benefited the Juncker Commission overall. They have allowed for greater intergovernmentalism, rule of law backsliding, informalisation and exceptionalism in EU AFSJ policies. The book puts forward a set of policy priorities for the next Commission term from mid-2019. It recommends unequivocally placing EU founding principles first – rule of law, fundamental rights and democracy – as these reinforce each other and work together in safeguarding the constitutional core of the EU and its member states. They are also key ingredients for ensuring the legitimation and credibility of European integration and maintaining social trust.

Related Publications

Browse through the list of related publications.

Crisis decision-making

How Covid-19 has changed the working methods of the EU institutions

20 year anniversary of the Tampere Programme

Europeanisation Dynamics of the EU area of Freedom, Security and Justice

Showing true illiberal colours

Rule of law vs Orbán’s pandemic politics

Love thy neighbour?

Coronavirus politics and their impact on EU freedoms and rule of law in the Schengen Area

Deliberative Democracy in the EU

Countering Populism with Participation and Debate

Cross-border Access to E-Evidence

Framing the Evidence