Fifty Ways to Leave Your Protection
Recent increases in the number of multilateral and preferential trade agreements have sparked the development of applied models to quantify the impact of trade agreements. Outcomes generally support the theoretical notion that liberalising trade increases welfare. The increase in aggregate welfare is attained through a restructuring of the economy, with possible painful effects for certain economic sectors or parts of the population. The current debate on trade liberalisation focuses on the distribution of costs and benefits.
Applied models can provide an understanding of the distribution of costs and benefits. Their outcomes, however, are determined by the way in which the economy and the liberalisation measures are modelled. The aim of this study is to compare different ways of quantifying the impact of the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements (EMAAs). Based on the assessment of key model features and analysed scenarios we assess to what extent existing studies address key policy issues related to the EMAAs and identify directions for future research.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1122.pdf | 281.36 KB | 1583 | 57 min 45 sec ago |
Recent increases in the number of multilateral and preferential trade agreements have sparked the development of applied models to quantify the impact of trade agreements. Outcomes generally support the theoretical notion that liberalising trade increases welfare. The increase in aggregate welfare is attained through a restructuring of the economy, with possible painful effects for certain economic sectors or parts of the population. The current debate on trade liberalisation focuses on the distribution of costs and benefits.
Applied models can provide an understanding of the distribution of costs and benefits. Their outcomes, however, are determined by the way in which the economy and the liberalisation measures are modelled. The aim of this study is to compare different ways of quantifying the impact of the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements (EMAAs). Based on the assessment of key model features and analysed scenarios we assess to what extent existing studies address key policy issues related to the EMAAs and identify directions for future research.
-en-973
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 0 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => f889eeacc226d834defb23f681f87ad3 [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [path] => book/fifty-ways-leave-your-protection [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 6 [safe] => 6 [view] => 6 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Marijke Kuiper [safe] => Marijke Kuiper ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1122 [safe] => 1122 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2004-04-01T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 01 April 2004 ) ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [tags] => Array ( ) [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [taxonomy_term_12] => Array ( [title] => Trade Developments [href] => taxonomy/term/12 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => ) ) [taxonomy_term_98] => Array ( [title] => ENARPRI Working Papers [href] => catalog/98 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => ENEPRI Working Papers re-publish selective studies that have been carried out by researchers associated with ENEPRI ) ) ) [files] => Array ( [820] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 820 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1122.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1122.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 288116 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-08-26 17:26:23 [nid] => 973 [vid] => 973 [description] => [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => [last_name] => [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 973 [nid] => 973 [container] => ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] =>Recent increases in the number of multilateral and preferential trade agreements have sparked the development of applied models to quantify the impact of trade agreements. Outcomes generally support the theoretical notion that liberalising trade increases welfare. The increase in aggregate welfare is attained through a restructuring of the economy, with possible painful effects for certain economic sectors or parts of the population. The current debate on trade liberalisation focuses on the distribution of costs and benefits.
Applied models can provide an understanding of the distribution of costs and benefits. Their outcomes, however, are determined by the way in which the economy and the liberalisation measures are modelled. The aim of this study is to compare different ways of quantifying the impact of the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements (EMAAs). Based on the assessment of key model features and analysed scenarios we assess to what extent existing studies address key policy issues related to the EMAAs and identify directions for future research.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1122.pdf | 281.36 KB | 1583 | 57 min 45 sec ago |
Recent increases in the number of multilateral and preferential trade agreements have sparked the development of applied models to quantify the impact of trade agreements. Outcomes generally support the theoretical notion that liberalising trade increases welfare. The increase in aggregate welfare is attained through a restructuring of the economy, with possible painful effects for certain economic sectors or parts of the population. The current debate on trade liberalisation focuses on the distribution of costs and benefits.
Applied models can provide an understanding of the distribution of costs and benefits. Their outcomes, however, are determined by the way in which the economy and the liberalisation measures are modelled. The aim of this study is to compare different ways of quantifying the impact of the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements (EMAAs). Based on the assessment of key model features and analysed scenarios we assess to what extent existing studies address key policy issues related to the EMAAs and identify directions for future research.
-en-973
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 0 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => f889eeacc226d834defb23f681f87ad3 [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [path] => book/fifty-ways-leave-your-protection [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 6 [safe] => 6 [view] => 6 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Marijke Kuiper [safe] => Marijke Kuiper ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1122 [safe] => 1122 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2004-04-01T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 01 April 2004 ) ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [tags] => Array ( ) [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [12] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 12 [vid] => 3 [name] => Trade Developments [description] => [weight] => 12 ) [98] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 98 [vid] => 4 [name] => ENARPRI Working Papers [description] => ENEPRI Working Papers re-publish selective studies that have been carried out by researchers associated with ENEPRI [weight] => 0 ) ) [files] => Array ( [820] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 820 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1122.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1122.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 288116 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-08-26 17:26:23 [nid] => 973 [vid] => 973 [description] => [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => [last_name] => [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 973 [nid] => 973 [container] => ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] => Array ( [print_links] => Array ( [#weight] => -101 [#suffix] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#title] => [#description] => [#printed] => 1 ) [display_price] => Array ( [#weight] => -10 [#access] => 1 [#value] =>BOOK
[#delta] => 0 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => [#children] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 1 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [2] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 2 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 2 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#single] => 1 [#attributes] => Array ( ) [#required] => [#parents] => Array ( ) [#tree] => [#context] => full [#page] => 1 [#field_name] => field_type [#title] => type [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => inline [#teaser] => [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type] => content_field [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] =>| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1122.pdf | 281.36 KB |
Recent increases in the number of multilateral and preferential trade agreements have sparked the development of applied models to quantify the impact of trade agreements. Outcomes generally support the theoretical notion that liberalising trade increases welfare. The increase in aggregate welfare is attained through a restructuring of the economy, with possible painful effects for certain economic sectors or parts of the population. The current debate on trade liberalisation focuses on the distribution of costs and benefits.
Applied models can provide an understanding of the distribution of costs and benefits. Their outcomes, however, are determined by the way in which the economy and the liberalisation measures are modelled. The aim of this study is to compare different ways of quantifying the impact of the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements (EMAAs). Based on the assessment of key model features and analysed scenarios we assess to what extent existing studies address key policy issues related to the EMAAs and identify directions for future research.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1122.pdf | 281.36 KB |
Recent increases in the number of multilateral and preferential trade agreements have sparked the development of applied models to quantify the impact of trade agreements. Outcomes generally support the theoretical notion that liberalising trade increases welfare. The increase in aggregate welfare is attained through a restructuring of the economy, with possible painful effects for certain economic sectors or parts of the population. The current debate on trade liberalisation focuses on the distribution of costs and benefits.
Applied models can provide an understanding of the distribution of costs and benefits. Their outcomes, however, are determined by the way in which the economy and the liberalisation measures are modelled. The aim of this study is to compare different ways of quantifying the impact of the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements (EMAAs). Based on the assessment of key model features and analysed scenarios we assess to what extent existing studies address key policy issues related to the EMAAs and identify directions for future research.
Researchers
Related Publications
- Do the European Union’s bilateral investment treaties matter?
- Enhancing Regional Trade Integration in Southeast Europe
- Die Auswirkungen der ATC-Liberalisierung auf die deutsche Textilwirtschaft
- A Qualitative Analysis of a Potential Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and South Korea
- The mega new-generation deal with Canada
- Canada and the European Union: Prospects for a Free Trade Agreement
- The EU Budget at Risk of a New Policy Blunder
- Prospects for the EU's New Generation of FTAs
- Global Supply Chains, Standards and the Poor
- Trade Agreements, Multifunctionality and EU Agriculture
Editor's choice
-
Financial Markets
-
Politics and Institutions
-
Justice and Home Affairs
-
Economic Policy
-
EU Neighbourhood Policy
-
Economic Policy