If citizens have a voice, who's listening? Lessons from recent citizen consultation experiments for the European Union
Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1856.pdf | 258.29 KB | 518 | 5 min 29 sec ago |
Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
978-92-9079-888-2-en-1679
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 1 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => c9c3029507c8c2b930671861c5509e7c [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [tags] => Array ( ) [path] => book/if-citizens-have-voice-whos-listening-lessons-recent-citizen-consultation-experiments-european- [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 978-92-9079-888-2 [safe] => 978-92-9079-888-2 ) ) [field_price] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 12 ) ) [field_book_series] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 94 [safe] => 94 ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 24 [safe] => 24 [view] => 24 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Stephen Boucher [safe] => Stephen Boucher ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1856 [safe] => 1856 ) ) [field_book_downloads] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 402 [safe] => 402 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 26 [view] => 26 ) ) [field_book_price_pdf] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0.00 ) ) [field_book_published] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2009-06-12 00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => datetime ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2009-06-12T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 12 June 2009 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => [view] => ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [taxonomy_term_22] => Array ( [title] => Politics and Institutions [href] => taxonomy/term/22 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => ) ) [taxonomy_term_94] => Array ( [title] => EPIN Working Papers [href] => catalog/94 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => This series contains analysis of key issues raised by the debate on the future of Europe and produced by the European Policy Institutes Network, a network of dynamic think tanks and policy institutes focusing on current EU political and policy debates. ) ) ) [files] => Array ( [1819] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 1819 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1856.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1856.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 264484 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-03 17:09:45 [nid] => 1679 [vid] => 1679 [description] => 1856.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => Radoslav [last_name] => Minkov [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] =>Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1856.pdf | 258.29 KB | 518 | 5 min 29 sec ago |
Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
978-92-9079-888-2-en-1679
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 1 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => c9c3029507c8c2b930671861c5509e7c [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [tags] => Array ( ) [path] => book/if-citizens-have-voice-whos-listening-lessons-recent-citizen-consultation-experiments-european- [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 978-92-9079-888-2 [safe] => 978-92-9079-888-2 ) ) [field_price] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 12 ) ) [field_book_series] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 94 [safe] => 94 ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 24 [safe] => 24 [view] => 24 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Stephen Boucher [safe] => Stephen Boucher ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1856 [safe] => 1856 ) ) [field_book_downloads] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 402 [safe] => 402 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 26 [view] => 26 ) ) [field_book_price_pdf] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0.00 ) ) [field_book_published] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2009-06-12 00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => datetime ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2009-06-12T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 12 June 2009 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => [view] => ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [22] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 22 [vid] => 3 [name] => Politics and Institutions [description] => [weight] => 8 ) [94] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 94 [vid] => 4 [name] => EPIN Working Papers [description] => This series contains analysis of key issues raised by the debate on the future of Europe and produced by the European Policy Institutes Network, a network of dynamic think tanks and policy institutes focusing on current EU political and policy debates. [weight] => 0 ) ) [files] => Array ( [1819] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 1819 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1856.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1856.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 264484 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-03 17:09:45 [nid] => 1679 [vid] => 1679 [description] => 1856.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => Radoslav [last_name] => Minkov [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] => Array ( [print_links] => Array ( [#weight] => -101 [#value] => [#title] => [#description] => [#printed] => 1 ) [display_price] => Array ( [#weight] => -10 [#access] => 1 [#value] =>BOOK
[#delta] => 0 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => [#children] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 1 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [2] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 2 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 2 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#single] => 1 [#attributes] => Array ( ) [#required] => [#parents] => Array ( ) [#tree] => [#context] => full [#page] => 1 [#field_name] => field_type [#title] => type [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => inline [#teaser] => [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type] => content_field [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] =>| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1856.pdf | 258.29 KB |
Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1856.pdf | 258.29 KB |
Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
Related Publications
- Think Global – Act European
- Capital Brussels: What kind of political actor will the Lisbon EU be?
- The European Citizens’ Initiative: A Proper Response from the Commission
- Fresh Opportunities from the Treaty of Lisbon
- Europe in the 21st century: Perspectives from the Lisbon Treaty
- Understanding Klaus: The Story of Czech Eurorealism
- Two new leaders in search of a job description
- Next time must be different
- The Treaty of Lisbon and the Czech Constitutional Court: Act II
- Staying in the Loop - The Commission’s role in first reading agreements
Related Articles
- Europe as a global actor: Views from the Spanish Presidency
- Keynote speech by José Manuel Durão Barroso at the Opening Dinner of the CEPS Annual Conference 2008
- Just what is this absorption capacity of the European Union? - Launch of a CEPS Policy Brief
- The Period of Reflection: Which way forward for Europe?
- Enlargement of the Eurozone: Why and When?