If citizens have a voice, who's listening? Lessons from recent citizen consultation experiments for the European Union
Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1856.pdf | 258.29 KB | 601 | 2 weeks 15 hours ago |
Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
978-92-9079-888-2-en-1679
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 1 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => c9c3029507c8c2b930671861c5509e7c [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [path] => book/if-citizens-have-voice-whos-listening-lessons-recent-citizen-consultation-experiments-european- [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 978-92-9079-888-2 [safe] => 978-92-9079-888-2 ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 24 [safe] => 24 [view] => 24 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Stephen Boucher [safe] => Stephen Boucher ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1856 [safe] => 1856 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 26 [view] => 26 ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2009-06-12T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 12 June 2009 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => [safe] => Array ( ) [view] => ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [tags] => Array ( ) [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [taxonomy_term_22] => Array ( [title] => Politics and Institutions [href] => taxonomy/term/22 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => ) ) [taxonomy_term_94] => Array ( [title] => EPIN Working Papers [href] => catalog/94 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => This series contains analysis of key issues raised by the debate on the future of Europe and produced by the European Policy Institutes Network, a network of dynamic think tanks and policy institutes focusing on current EU political and policy debates. ) ) ) [files] => Array ( [1819] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 1819 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1856.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1856.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 264484 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-03 17:09:45 [nid] => 1679 [vid] => 1679 [description] => 1856.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => [last_name] => [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 1679 [nid] => 1679 [container] => ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] =>Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1856.pdf | 258.29 KB | 601 | 2 weeks 15 hours ago |
Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
978-92-9079-888-2-en-1679
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 1 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => c9c3029507c8c2b930671861c5509e7c [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [path] => book/if-citizens-have-voice-whos-listening-lessons-recent-citizen-consultation-experiments-european- [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 978-92-9079-888-2 [safe] => 978-92-9079-888-2 ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 24 [safe] => 24 [view] => 24 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Stephen Boucher [safe] => Stephen Boucher ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1856 [safe] => 1856 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 26 [view] => 26 ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2009-06-12T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 12 June 2009 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => [safe] => Array ( ) [view] => ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [tags] => Array ( ) [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [22] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 22 [vid] => 3 [name] => Politics and Institutions [description] => [weight] => 8 ) [94] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 94 [vid] => 4 [name] => EPIN Working Papers [description] => This series contains analysis of key issues raised by the debate on the future of Europe and produced by the European Policy Institutes Network, a network of dynamic think tanks and policy institutes focusing on current EU political and policy debates. [weight] => 0 ) ) [files] => Array ( [1819] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 1819 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1856.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1856.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 264484 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-03 17:09:45 [nid] => 1679 [vid] => 1679 [description] => 1856.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => [last_name] => [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 1679 [nid] => 1679 [container] => ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] => Array ( [print_links] => Array ( [#weight] => -101 [#suffix] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#title] => [#description] => [#printed] => 1 ) [display_price] => Array ( [#weight] => -10 [#access] => 1 [#value] =>BOOK
[#delta] => 0 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => [#children] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 1 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [2] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 2 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 2 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#single] => 1 [#attributes] => Array ( ) [#required] => [#parents] => Array ( ) [#tree] => [#context] => full [#page] => 1 [#field_name] => field_type [#title] => type [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => inline [#teaser] => [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type] => content_field [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] =>| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1856.pdf | 258.29 KB |
Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1856.pdf | 258.29 KB |
Are European Union institutions, as they claim, really listening to citizens thanks to more ‘deliberative’ consultation tools? The European Commission and the European Parliament in particular have committed themselves to engaging in a dialogue with citizens in recent years. But to what effect? This paper notes how official policies have adopted language borrowed from the deliberative democracy school of thinking, but denounces the lack of clarity in the role assigned to deliberation with citizens in EU policy-making processes. It also invites EU policy-makers to think more critically about recent and future experiments that present themselves as ‘deliberative’. It does so by highlighting areas for improvement in recent initiatives. Finally, it makes a number of recommendations for the future of dialogue with citizens, suggesting in particular the creation of a European Observatory for Democracy and Opinion, as well as a list of criteria to assess the design and role of such activities, and the concentration of efforts on one high-quality, high-impact initiative per year.
Stephen Boucher is the Programme Director at the European Climate Foundation.
Researchers
Related Publications
- Lisbon five months on: Surveying the new EU political scene
- Pain in Poland
- On High Stakes, Stakeholders and Bulgaria’s EU Membership
- Single voice, single chair? How to re-organise the EU in international negotiations under the Lisbon rules
- Think Global – Act European
- Capital Brussels: What kind of political actor will the Lisbon EU be?
- The European Citizens’ Initiative: A Proper Response from the Commission
- Fresh Opportunities from the Treaty of Lisbon
- Europe in the 21st century: Perspectives from the Lisbon Treaty
- Understanding Klaus: The Story of Czech Eurorealism
Editor's choice
-
Financial Markets
-
Politics and Institutions
-
Justice and Home Affairs
-
Economic Policy
-
EU Neighbourhood Policy
-
Economic Policy
Related Entries
- Implementing Lisbon: The first steps - CEPS Annual Conference 2010
- Europe as a global actor: Views from the Spanish Presidency
- Politics and Institutions
- The Priorities of the Swedish Presidency of the EU - Speech by Fredrik Reinfeldt, Prime Minister of Sweden, at a special CEPS Luncheon
- CEPS Annual Conference 2009: "The Quest for European Leadership"