Fairness Opinions and Capital Markets: Evidence from Germany, Switzerland and Austria
This paper provides the first empirical evidence of fairness opinions in Europe. Legal requirements concerning the use of fairness opinions in mergers and acquisitions are significantly different in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. We examine the determinants of fairness opinions for target firms in these various regulatory settings, and moreover, investigate the impact of such opinions on the abnormal returns of target firms. While in Germany and Austria market participants do not deem fairness opinions important, they do create value for shareholders in Switzerland. Because conflicts of interest between the target’s board and bidder are a main determinant of fairness opinions in Switzerland, we conclude that when the target’s management faces such conflict, external expert advice replaces the board’s opinion on the offer.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1773.pdf | 240.28 KB | 575 | 5 hours 15 min ago |
This paper provides the first empirical evidence of fairness opinions in Europe. Legal requirements concerning the use of fairness opinions in mergers and acquisitions are significantly different in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. We examine the determinants of fairness opinions for target firms in these various regulatory settings, and moreover, investigate the impact of such opinions on the abnormal returns of target firms. While in Germany and Austria market participants do not deem fairness opinions important, they do create value for shareholders in Switzerland. Because conflicts of interest between the target’s board and bidder are a main determinant of fairness opinions in Switzerland, we conclude that when the target’s management faces such conflict, external expert advice replaces the board’s opinion on the offer.
978-92-9079-842-2-en-1596
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 1 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => 0ae297ac74adc626ffa2274b9661ac22 [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [path] => book/fairness-opinions-and-capital-markets-evidence-germany-switzerland-and-austria [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 978-92-9079-842-2 [safe] => 978-92-9079-842-2 ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 4 [safe] => 4 [view] => 4 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Sebasian Lobe and Nils-Christian Schenk [safe] => Sebasian Lobe and Nils-Christian Schenk ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1773 [safe] => 1773 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 18 [view] => 18 ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2009-01-07T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 07 January 2009 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => [safe] => Array ( ) [view] => ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [tags] => Array ( ) [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [taxonomy_term_5] => Array ( [title] => Financial Markets [href] => taxonomy/term/5 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => ) ) [taxonomy_term_108] => Array ( [title] => ECMI Research Reports [href] => catalog/108 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => Produced by the European Capital Markets Institute, which is managed and staffed by CEPS, reports in this series contain in-depth analyses on the forces that are driving changes in capital markets today. ) ) ) [files] => Array ( [1701] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 1701 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1773.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1773.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 246043 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-08 16:26:13 [nid] => 1596 [vid] => 1596 [description] => 1773.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => [last_name] => [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 1596 [nid] => 1596 [container] => ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] =>This paper provides the first empirical evidence of fairness opinions in Europe. Legal requirements concerning the use of fairness opinions in mergers and acquisitions are significantly different in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. We examine the determinants of fairness opinions for target firms in these various regulatory settings, and moreover, investigate the impact of such opinions on the abnormal returns of target firms. While in Germany and Austria market participants do not deem fairness opinions important, they do create value for shareholders in Switzerland. Because conflicts of interest between the target’s board and bidder are a main determinant of fairness opinions in Switzerland, we conclude that when the target’s management faces such conflict, external expert advice replaces the board’s opinion on the offer.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1773.pdf | 240.28 KB | 575 | 5 hours 15 min ago |
This paper provides the first empirical evidence of fairness opinions in Europe. Legal requirements concerning the use of fairness opinions in mergers and acquisitions are significantly different in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. We examine the determinants of fairness opinions for target firms in these various regulatory settings, and moreover, investigate the impact of such opinions on the abnormal returns of target firms. While in Germany and Austria market participants do not deem fairness opinions important, they do create value for shareholders in Switzerland. Because conflicts of interest between the target’s board and bidder are a main determinant of fairness opinions in Switzerland, we conclude that when the target’s management faces such conflict, external expert advice replaces the board’s opinion on the offer.
978-92-9079-842-2-en-1596
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 1 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => 0ae297ac74adc626ffa2274b9661ac22 [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [path] => book/fairness-opinions-and-capital-markets-evidence-germany-switzerland-and-austria [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 978-92-9079-842-2 [safe] => 978-92-9079-842-2 ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 4 [safe] => 4 [view] => 4 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Sebasian Lobe and Nils-Christian Schenk [safe] => Sebasian Lobe and Nils-Christian Schenk ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1773 [safe] => 1773 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 18 [view] => 18 ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2009-01-07T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 07 January 2009 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => [safe] => Array ( ) [view] => ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [tags] => Array ( ) [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [5] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 5 [vid] => 3 [name] => Financial Markets [description] => [weight] => 6 ) [108] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 108 [vid] => 4 [name] => ECMI Research Reports [description] => Produced by the European Capital Markets Institute, which is managed and staffed by CEPS, reports in this series contain in-depth analyses on the forces that are driving changes in capital markets today. [weight] => 0 ) ) [files] => Array ( [1701] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 1701 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1773.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1773.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 246043 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-08 16:26:13 [nid] => 1596 [vid] => 1596 [description] => 1773.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => [last_name] => [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 1596 [nid] => 1596 [container] => ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] => Array ( [print_links] => Array ( [#weight] => -101 [#suffix] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#title] => [#description] => [#printed] => 1 ) [display_price] => Array ( [#weight] => -10 [#access] => 1 [#value] =>BOOK
[#delta] => 0 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => [#children] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 1 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [2] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 2 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 2 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#single] => 1 [#attributes] => Array ( ) [#required] => [#parents] => Array ( ) [#tree] => [#context] => full [#page] => 1 [#field_name] => field_type [#title] => type [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => inline [#teaser] => [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type] => content_field [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] =>| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1773.pdf | 240.28 KB |
This paper provides the first empirical evidence of fairness opinions in Europe. Legal requirements concerning the use of fairness opinions in mergers and acquisitions are significantly different in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. We examine the determinants of fairness opinions for target firms in these various regulatory settings, and moreover, investigate the impact of such opinions on the abnormal returns of target firms. While in Germany and Austria market participants do not deem fairness opinions important, they do create value for shareholders in Switzerland. Because conflicts of interest between the target’s board and bidder are a main determinant of fairness opinions in Switzerland, we conclude that when the target’s management faces such conflict, external expert advice replaces the board’s opinion on the offer.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1773.pdf | 240.28 KB |
This paper provides the first empirical evidence of fairness opinions in Europe. Legal requirements concerning the use of fairness opinions in mergers and acquisitions are significantly different in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. We examine the determinants of fairness opinions for target firms in these various regulatory settings, and moreover, investigate the impact of such opinions on the abnormal returns of target firms. While in Germany and Austria market participants do not deem fairness opinions important, they do create value for shareholders in Switzerland. Because conflicts of interest between the target’s board and bidder are a main determinant of fairness opinions in Switzerland, we conclude that when the target’s management faces such conflict, external expert advice replaces the board’s opinion on the offer.
Related Publications
- Lending to Households in Europe (1995-2009): ECRI Statistical Package 2010
- Consumer Credit in Europe (1995-2009): ECRI Statistical Package 2010
- The bank stress tests: a work in progress
- Europe 2020 and the Financial System: Smaller is beautiful
- The role of politicians in inciting financial markets to attack the eurozone
- Do we need a resolution fund paid for by financial institutions?
- When financial markets force too much austerity
- The MiFID Metamorphosis
- The Future of Retail Banking in Europe: Competition and regulatory challenges
- Regulatory Challenges for the EU Asset Management Industry
Editor's choice
-
Financial Markets
-
Politics and Institutions
-
Justice and Home Affairs
-
Economic Policy
-
EU Neighbourhood Policy
-
Economic Policy