Update on the Ratification Debates: What Prospects for the European Constitutional Treaty? Results of and EPIN Survey of Nationa
Since EPIN’s first monitoring report in January, the issue of the European Constitution has grown in relevance and visibility in many member states. Yet there continue to be important differences in how the individual aspects of the text are perceived in the various national debates. This update of EPIN’s survey on the progress and obstacles to ratification of the European Constitutional Treaty provides a snapshot of the approval processes in the different EU member states at a crucial point in time, just before the vote in France and the Netherlands. The paper draws from EPIN network experts in the 25 EU countries and offers a reassessment of the probability of ratification.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1223.pdf | 221.49 KB | 2406 | 4 hours 57 min ago |
Since EPIN’s first monitoring report in January, the issue of the European Constitution has grown in relevance and visibility in many member states. Yet there continue to be important differences in how the individual aspects of the text are perceived in the various national debates. This update of EPIN’s survey on the progress and obstacles to ratification of the European Constitutional Treaty provides a snapshot of the approval processes in the different EU member states at a crucial point in time, just before the vote in France and the Netherlands. The paper draws from EPIN network experts in the 25 EU countries and offers a reassessment of the probability of ratification.
-en-1069
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 0 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => 1dc78169a24ec54317a51e7232e3fa5e [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [tags] => Array ( ) [path] => book/update-ratification-debates-what-prospects-european-constitutional-treaty-results-and-epin-surv [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_price] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 12 ) ) [field_book_series] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 94 [safe] => 94 ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 13 [safe] => 13 [view] => 13 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Sebastian Kurpas, Justus Schönlau [safe] => Sebastian Kurpas, Justus Schönlau ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1223 [safe] => 1223 ) ) [field_book_downloads] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2341 [safe] => 2341 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_price_pdf] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0.00 ) ) [field_book_published] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2005-05-01 00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => datetime ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2005-05-01T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 01 May 2005 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => 226 [view] => Marco Incerti ) [1] => Array ( [nid] => 291 [view] => Julia De Clerck-Sachsse ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [taxonomy_term_22] => Array ( [title] => Politics and Institutions [href] => taxonomy/term/22 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => ) ) [taxonomy_term_94] => Array ( [title] => EPIN Working Papers [href] => catalog/94 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => This series contains analysis of key issues raised by the debate on the future of Europe and produced by the European Policy Institutes Network, a network of dynamic think tanks and policy institutes focusing on current EU political and policy debates. ) ) ) [files] => Array ( [925] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 925 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1223.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1223.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 226804 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-16 15:30:15 [nid] => 1069 [vid] => 1069 [description] => 1223.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => Radoslav [last_name] => Minkov [company] => CEPS [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 [phone] => ) [usps] => [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] =>Since EPIN’s first monitoring report in January, the issue of the European Constitution has grown in relevance and visibility in many member states. Yet there continue to be important differences in how the individual aspects of the text are perceived in the various national debates. This update of EPIN’s survey on the progress and obstacles to ratification of the European Constitutional Treaty provides a snapshot of the approval processes in the different EU member states at a crucial point in time, just before the vote in France and the Netherlands. The paper draws from EPIN network experts in the 25 EU countries and offers a reassessment of the probability of ratification.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1223.pdf | 221.49 KB | 2406 | 4 hours 57 min ago |
Since EPIN’s first monitoring report in January, the issue of the European Constitution has grown in relevance and visibility in many member states. Yet there continue to be important differences in how the individual aspects of the text are perceived in the various national debates. This update of EPIN’s survey on the progress and obstacles to ratification of the European Constitutional Treaty provides a snapshot of the approval processes in the different EU member states at a crucial point in time, just before the vote in France and the Netherlands. The paper draws from EPIN network experts in the 25 EU countries and offers a reassessment of the probability of ratification.
-en-1069
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 0 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => 1dc78169a24ec54317a51e7232e3fa5e [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [tags] => Array ( ) [path] => book/update-ratification-debates-what-prospects-european-constitutional-treaty-results-and-epin-surv [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_price] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 12 ) ) [field_book_series] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 94 [safe] => 94 ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 13 [safe] => 13 [view] => 13 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => Sebastian Kurpas, Justus Schönlau [safe] => Sebastian Kurpas, Justus Schönlau ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1223 [safe] => 1223 ) ) [field_book_downloads] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2341 [safe] => 2341 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_price_pdf] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0.00 ) ) [field_book_published] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2005-05-01 00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => datetime ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2005-05-01T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 01 May 2005 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => 226 [view] => Marco Incerti ) [1] => Array ( [nid] => 291 [view] => Julia De Clerck-Sachsse ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [22] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 22 [vid] => 3 [name] => Politics and Institutions [description] => [weight] => 8 ) [94] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 94 [vid] => 4 [name] => EPIN Working Papers [description] => This series contains analysis of key issues raised by the debate on the future of Europe and produced by the European Policy Institutes Network, a network of dynamic think tanks and policy institutes focusing on current EU political and policy debates. [weight] => 0 ) ) [files] => Array ( [925] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 925 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1223.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1223.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 226804 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-16 15:30:15 [nid] => 1069 [vid] => 1069 [description] => 1223.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => Radoslav [last_name] => Minkov [company] => CEPS [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 [phone] => ) [usps] => [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] => Array ( [print_links] => Array ( [#weight] => -101 [#value] => [#title] => [#description] => [#printed] => 1 ) [display_price] => Array ( [#weight] => -10 [#access] => 1 [#value] =>BOOK
[#delta] => 0 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => [#children] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 1 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [2] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 2 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 2 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#single] => 1 [#attributes] => Array ( ) [#required] => [#parents] => Array ( ) [#tree] => [#context] => full [#page] => 1 [#field_name] => field_type [#title] => type [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => inline [#teaser] => [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type] => content_field [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] =>| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1223.pdf | 221.49 KB |
Since EPIN’s first monitoring report in January, the issue of the European Constitution has grown in relevance and visibility in many member states. Yet there continue to be important differences in how the individual aspects of the text are perceived in the various national debates. This update of EPIN’s survey on the progress and obstacles to ratification of the European Constitutional Treaty provides a snapshot of the approval processes in the different EU member states at a crucial point in time, just before the vote in France and the Netherlands. The paper draws from EPIN network experts in the 25 EU countries and offers a reassessment of the probability of ratification.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1223.pdf | 221.49 KB |
Since EPIN’s first monitoring report in January, the issue of the European Constitution has grown in relevance and visibility in many member states. Yet there continue to be important differences in how the individual aspects of the text are perceived in the various national debates. This update of EPIN’s survey on the progress and obstacles to ratification of the European Constitutional Treaty provides a snapshot of the approval processes in the different EU member states at a crucial point in time, just before the vote in France and the Netherlands. The paper draws from EPIN network experts in the 25 EU countries and offers a reassessment of the probability of ratification.
Related Publications
- The European Citizens’ Initiative: A Proper Response from the Commission
- Fresh Opportunities from the Treaty of Lisbon
- Europe in the 21st century: Perspectives from the Lisbon Treaty
- Understanding Klaus: The Story of Czech Eurorealism
- Two new leaders in search of a job description
- Next time must be different
- The Treaty of Lisbon and the Czech Constitutional Court: Act II
- Staying in the Loop - The Commission’s role in first reading agreements
- Lessons from the Czech EU Presidency
- The New European Parliament: All change or business as usual?
Related Articles
- Europe as a global actor: Views from the Spanish Presidency
- Keynote speech by José Manuel Durão Barroso at the Opening Dinner of the CEPS Annual Conference 2008
- Just what is this absorption capacity of the European Union? - Launch of a CEPS Policy Brief
- The Period of Reflection: Which way forward for Europe?
- Enlargement of the Eurozone: Why and When?