What Does Freedom of Movement Mean in an Enlarged EU?
The purpose of this report is to assess the main challenges to the principle of free movement of persons in theory and practice in an enlarged European Union. The right to move freely represents one of the fundamental freedoms of the internal market as well as an essential political element of the package of rights linked to the very status of EU citizenship.
The scope ratione personae and the current state of the principle of free movement of persons is assessed by looking at the most recent case law of the European Court of Justice and the recently adopted Directive on the rights of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states. But what are the hidden and visible obstacles to free movement of persons in Europe? How can these barriers be overcome to make free movement and residence rights more inclusive? This working document addresses these questions along with:
1. Who are the beneficiaries of the free movement of persons in an enlarged Europe?
2. What is the impact of the recent legal developments in the freedom of movement dimension, such as the European Court of Justice case law and the new Directive?
3. To what extent are pro-security policies such as the Schengen Information System II and an enhanced interoperability between European databases fully compatible with the freedom of movement paradigm?
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1162.pdf | 751.84 KB | 4324 | 18 hours 7 min ago |
The purpose of this report is to assess the main challenges to the principle of free movement of persons in theory and practice in an enlarged European Union. The right to move freely represents one of the fundamental freedoms of the internal market as well as an essential political element of the package of rights linked to the very status of EU citizenship.
The scope ratione personae and the current state of the principle of free movement of persons is assessed by looking at the most recent case law of the European Court of Justice and the recently adopted Directive on the rights of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states. But what are the hidden and visible obstacles to free movement of persons in Europe? How can these barriers be overcome to make free movement and residence rights more inclusive? This working document addresses these questions along with:
1. Who are the beneficiaries of the free movement of persons in an enlarged Europe?
2. What is the impact of the recent legal developments in the freedom of movement dimension, such as the European Court of Justice case law and the new Directive?
3. To what extent are pro-security policies such as the Schengen Information System II and an enhanced interoperability between European databases fully compatible with the freedom of movement paradigm?
-en-1009
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 0 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => 055e9c818b04d06eb5421b92e9eabdd3 [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [tags] => Array ( ) [path] => book/what-does-freedom-movement-mean-enlarged-eu [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_price] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 12 ) ) [field_book_series] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 89 [safe] => 89 ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 208 [safe] => 208 [view] => 208 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1162 [safe] => 1162 ) ) [field_book_downloads] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 4262 [safe] => 4262 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_price_pdf] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0.00 ) ) [field_book_published] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2004-10-01 00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => datetime ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2004-10-01T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 01 October 2004 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => 287 [view] => Sergio Carrera ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [taxonomy_term_23] => Array ( [title] => Justice and Home Affairs [href] => taxonomy/term/23 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => ) ) [taxonomy_term_89] => Array ( [title] => CEPS Working Documents [href] => catalog/89 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => Give an indication of work being conducted within CEPS research programmes and are aimed at stimulating reactions from other experts in the field. ) ) ) [files] => Array ( [858] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 858 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1162.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1162.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 769881 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-10-14 17:03:46 [nid] => 1009 [vid] => 1009 [description] => 1162.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => Radoslav [last_name] => Minkov [company] => CEPS [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 [phone] => ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 1009 [nid] => 1009 [container] => RECTANGULAR ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] =>The purpose of this report is to assess the main challenges to the principle of free movement of persons in theory and practice in an enlarged European Union. The right to move freely represents one of the fundamental freedoms of the internal market as well as an essential political element of the package of rights linked to the very status of EU citizenship.
The scope ratione personae and the current state of the principle of free movement of persons is assessed by looking at the most recent case law of the European Court of Justice and the recently adopted Directive on the rights of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states. But what are the hidden and visible obstacles to free movement of persons in Europe? How can these barriers be overcome to make free movement and residence rights more inclusive? This working document addresses these questions along with:
1. Who are the beneficiaries of the free movement of persons in an enlarged Europe?
2. What is the impact of the recent legal developments in the freedom of movement dimension, such as the European Court of Justice case law and the new Directive?
3. To what extent are pro-security policies such as the Schengen Information System II and an enhanced interoperability between European databases fully compatible with the freedom of movement paradigm?
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1162.pdf | 751.84 KB | 4324 | 18 hours 7 min ago |
The purpose of this report is to assess the main challenges to the principle of free movement of persons in theory and practice in an enlarged European Union. The right to move freely represents one of the fundamental freedoms of the internal market as well as an essential political element of the package of rights linked to the very status of EU citizenship.
The scope ratione personae and the current state of the principle of free movement of persons is assessed by looking at the most recent case law of the European Court of Justice and the recently adopted Directive on the rights of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states. But what are the hidden and visible obstacles to free movement of persons in Europe? How can these barriers be overcome to make free movement and residence rights more inclusive? This working document addresses these questions along with:
1. Who are the beneficiaries of the free movement of persons in an enlarged Europe?
2. What is the impact of the recent legal developments in the freedom of movement dimension, such as the European Court of Justice case law and the new Directive?
3. To what extent are pro-security policies such as the Schengen Information System II and an enhanced interoperability between European databases fully compatible with the freedom of movement paradigm?
-en-1009
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 0 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => 055e9c818b04d06eb5421b92e9eabdd3 [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [tags] => Array ( ) [path] => book/what-does-freedom-movement-mean-enlarged-eu [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_price] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 12 ) ) [field_book_series] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 89 [safe] => 89 ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 208 [safe] => 208 [view] => 208 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1162 [safe] => 1162 ) ) [field_book_downloads] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 4262 [safe] => 4262 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_price_pdf] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 0.00 ) ) [field_book_published] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2004-10-01 00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => datetime ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2004-10-01T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 01 October 2004 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => 287 [view] => Sergio Carrera ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [23] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 23 [vid] => 3 [name] => Justice and Home Affairs [description] => [weight] => 7 ) [89] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 89 [vid] => 4 [name] => CEPS Working Documents [description] => Give an indication of work being conducted within CEPS research programmes and are aimed at stimulating reactions from other experts in the field. [weight] => 0 ) ) [files] => Array ( [858] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 858 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1162.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1162.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 769881 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-10-14 17:03:46 [nid] => 1009 [vid] => 1009 [description] => 1162.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => Radoslav [last_name] => Minkov [company] => CEPS [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 [phone] => ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 1009 [nid] => 1009 [container] => RECTANGULAR ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] => Array ( [print_links] => Array ( [#weight] => -101 [#value] => [#title] => [#description] => [#printed] => 1 ) [display_price] => Array ( [#weight] => -10 [#access] => 1 [#value] =>BOOK
[#delta] => 0 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => [#children] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 1 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [2] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 2 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 2 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#single] => 1 [#attributes] => Array ( ) [#required] => [#parents] => Array ( ) [#tree] => [#context] => full [#page] => 1 [#field_name] => field_type [#title] => type [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => inline [#teaser] => [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type] => content_field [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] =>| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1162.pdf | 751.84 KB |
The purpose of this report is to assess the main challenges to the principle of free movement of persons in theory and practice in an enlarged European Union. The right to move freely represents one of the fundamental freedoms of the internal market as well as an essential political element of the package of rights linked to the very status of EU citizenship.
The scope ratione personae and the current state of the principle of free movement of persons is assessed by looking at the most recent case law of the European Court of Justice and the recently adopted Directive on the rights of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states. But what are the hidden and visible obstacles to free movement of persons in Europe? How can these barriers be overcome to make free movement and residence rights more inclusive? This working document addresses these questions along with:
1. Who are the beneficiaries of the free movement of persons in an enlarged Europe?
2. What is the impact of the recent legal developments in the freedom of movement dimension, such as the European Court of Justice case law and the new Directive?
3. To what extent are pro-security policies such as the Schengen Information System II and an enhanced interoperability between European databases fully compatible with the freedom of movement paradigm?
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1162.pdf | 751.84 KB |
The purpose of this report is to assess the main challenges to the principle of free movement of persons in theory and practice in an enlarged European Union. The right to move freely represents one of the fundamental freedoms of the internal market as well as an essential political element of the package of rights linked to the very status of EU citizenship.
The scope ratione personae and the current state of the principle of free movement of persons is assessed by looking at the most recent case law of the European Court of Justice and the recently adopted Directive on the rights of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states. But what are the hidden and visible obstacles to free movement of persons in Europe? How can these barriers be overcome to make free movement and residence rights more inclusive? This working document addresses these questions along with:
1. Who are the beneficiaries of the free movement of persons in an enlarged Europe?
2. What is the impact of the recent legal developments in the freedom of movement dimension, such as the European Court of Justice case law and the new Directive?
3. To what extent are pro-security policies such as the Schengen Information System II and an enhanced interoperability between European databases fully compatible with the freedom of movement paradigm?
Related Publications
- The Union for the Mediterranean: What has it changed and what can be changed in the domain of security?
- Undocumented Immigrants and Rights in the EU: Addressing the Gap between Social Sciences Research and Policy-making
- EU Security Policies towards the Mediterranean: The Ethical Dimension – what do we know and what else should we know?
- Security Ethics: A Thin Blue-Green-Grey Line
- Made in the USA? The Influence of the US on the EU’s Data Protection Regime
- Border Security, Technology and the Stockholm Programme
- Latin American Reactions to the Adoption of the Returns Directive
- The Externalisation of the EU’s Labour Immigration Policy: Towards mobility or insecurity partnerships?
- Civic Integration of Third-Country Nationals: Nationalism versus Europeanisation in the Common EU Immigration Policy
- Illiberal Liberal States: Immigration, Citizenship and Integration in the EU
Related Articles
- Tiptoeing towards a Common Criminal Law? Reflections on the EU Constitution
- Management of border controls in Europe: Towards a Common European-Border guard?
- Justice and Home Affairs
- The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights: Priorities and Challenges
- Asylum and Resettlement in the EU, does the Canadian Resettlement Program provide a model?