The Reform of the Credit Rating Agencies: A Comparative Perspective
Credit ratings are a quasi-public good, and investors and financial markets regulators need an independent assessment of the credit-worthiness of an issuing entity because of information asymmetries and principal agent problems. In light of the high volatility of market-based measures and the failure of internal risk management, private CRAs are best fit for purpose. However, natural barriers of entry in the rating business and conflicts of interest have led to an inflation of ratings and a deterioration in their quality. It would thus appear that CRAs need closer supervision. While certainly burdensome and likely to raise barriers of entry, the European Commission's proposal seems to be the most sensible solution given the circumstances. Market discipline based on competition and transparency as envisioned in the US will lead to a weak surveillance regime, while leaving the regulatory license intact.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1797.pdf | 213.28 KB | 545 | 11 hours 19 min ago |
Credit ratings are a quasi-public good, and investors and financial markets regulators need an independent assessment of the credit-worthiness of an issuing entity because of information asymmetries and principal agent problems. In light of the high volatility of market-based measures and the failure of internal risk management, private CRAs are best fit for purpose. However, natural barriers of entry in the rating business and conflicts of interest have led to an inflation of ratings and a deterioration in their quality. It would thus appear that CRAs need closer supervision. While certainly burdensome and likely to raise barriers of entry, the European Commission's proposal seems to be the most sensible solution given the circumstances. Market discipline based on competition and transparency as envisioned in the US will lead to a weak surveillance regime, while leaving the regulatory license intact.
-en-1619
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 1 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => ad94a5e4e9cff34dfc97485b90c3d20c [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [path] => book/reform-credit-rating-agencies-comparative-perspective [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 12 [safe] => 12 [view] => 12 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1797 [safe] => 1797 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 12 [view] => 12 ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2009-02-13T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 13 February 2009 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => 2071 [safe] => Array ( [nid] => 2071 [title] => Piero Cinquegrana [status] => 1 ) [view] => Piero Cinquegrana ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [tags] => Array ( ) [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [taxonomy_term_5] => Array ( [title] => Financial Markets [href] => taxonomy/term/5 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => ) ) [taxonomy_term_106] => Array ( [title] => ECMI Policy Briefs [href] => catalog/106 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => Produced by the European Capital Markets Institute, which is managed and staffed by CEPS, papers in this new series provide authoritative insights into ongoing regulatory initiatives that will alter the European financial landscape. ) ) ) [files] => Array ( [1737] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 1737 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1797.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1797.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 218397 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-08 15:31:36 [nid] => 1619 [vid] => 1619 [description] => 1797.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => [last_name] => [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 1619 [nid] => 1619 [container] => RECTANGULAR ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] =>Credit ratings are a quasi-public good, and investors and financial markets regulators need an independent assessment of the credit-worthiness of an issuing entity because of information asymmetries and principal agent problems. In light of the high volatility of market-based measures and the failure of internal risk management, private CRAs are best fit for purpose. However, natural barriers of entry in the rating business and conflicts of interest have led to an inflation of ratings and a deterioration in their quality. It would thus appear that CRAs need closer supervision. While certainly burdensome and likely to raise barriers of entry, the European Commission's proposal seems to be the most sensible solution given the circumstances. Market discipline based on competition and transparency as envisioned in the US will lead to a weak surveillance regime, while leaving the regulatory license intact.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1797.pdf | 213.28 KB | 545 | 11 hours 19 min ago |
Credit ratings are a quasi-public good, and investors and financial markets regulators need an independent assessment of the credit-worthiness of an issuing entity because of information asymmetries and principal agent problems. In light of the high volatility of market-based measures and the failure of internal risk management, private CRAs are best fit for purpose. However, natural barriers of entry in the rating business and conflicts of interest have led to an inflation of ratings and a deterioration in their quality. It would thus appear that CRAs need closer supervision. While certainly burdensome and likely to raise barriers of entry, the European Commission's proposal seems to be the most sensible solution given the circumstances. Market discipline based on competition and transparency as envisioned in the US will lead to a weak surveillance regime, while leaving the regulatory license intact.
-en-1619
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 1 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => ad94a5e4e9cff34dfc97485b90c3d20c [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [path] => book/reform-credit-rating-agencies-comparative-perspective [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 12 [safe] => 12 [view] => 12 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1797 [safe] => 1797 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 12 [view] => 12 ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2009-02-13T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 13 February 2009 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => 2071 [safe] => Array ( [nid] => 2071 [title] => Piero Cinquegrana [status] => 1 ) [view] => Piero Cinquegrana ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [tags] => Array ( ) [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [5] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 5 [vid] => 3 [name] => Financial Markets [description] => [weight] => 6 ) [106] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 106 [vid] => 4 [name] => ECMI Policy Briefs [description] => Produced by the European Capital Markets Institute, which is managed and staffed by CEPS, papers in this new series provide authoritative insights into ongoing regulatory initiatives that will alter the European financial landscape. [weight] => 0 ) ) [files] => Array ( [1737] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 1737 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1797.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1797.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 218397 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-08 15:31:36 [nid] => 1619 [vid] => 1619 [description] => 1797.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => [last_name] => [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 1619 [nid] => 1619 [container] => RECTANGULAR ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] => Array ( [print_links] => Array ( [#weight] => -101 [#suffix] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#title] => [#description] => [#printed] => 1 ) [display_price] => Array ( [#weight] => -10 [#access] => 1 [#value] =>BOOK
[#delta] => 0 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => [#children] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 1 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [2] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 2 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 2 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#single] => 1 [#attributes] => Array ( ) [#required] => [#parents] => Array ( ) [#tree] => [#context] => full [#page] => 1 [#field_name] => field_type [#title] => type [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => inline [#teaser] => [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type] => content_field [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] =>| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1797.pdf | 213.28 KB |
Credit ratings are a quasi-public good, and investors and financial markets regulators need an independent assessment of the credit-worthiness of an issuing entity because of information asymmetries and principal agent problems. In light of the high volatility of market-based measures and the failure of internal risk management, private CRAs are best fit for purpose. However, natural barriers of entry in the rating business and conflicts of interest have led to an inflation of ratings and a deterioration in their quality. It would thus appear that CRAs need closer supervision. While certainly burdensome and likely to raise barriers of entry, the European Commission's proposal seems to be the most sensible solution given the circumstances. Market discipline based on competition and transparency as envisioned in the US will lead to a weak surveillance regime, while leaving the regulatory license intact.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1797.pdf | 213.28 KB |
Credit ratings are a quasi-public good, and investors and financial markets regulators need an independent assessment of the credit-worthiness of an issuing entity because of information asymmetries and principal agent problems. In light of the high volatility of market-based measures and the failure of internal risk management, private CRAs are best fit for purpose. However, natural barriers of entry in the rating business and conflicts of interest have led to an inflation of ratings and a deterioration in their quality. It would thus appear that CRAs need closer supervision. While certainly burdensome and likely to raise barriers of entry, the European Commission's proposal seems to be the most sensible solution given the circumstances. Market discipline based on competition and transparency as envisioned in the US will lead to a weak surveillance regime, while leaving the regulatory license intact.
Related Publications
- Lending to Households in Europe (1995-2009): ECRI Statistical Package 2010
- Consumer Credit in Europe (1995-2009): ECRI Statistical Package 2010
- The bank stress tests: a work in progress
- Europe 2020 and the Financial System: Smaller is beautiful
- The role of politicians in inciting financial markets to attack the eurozone
- Do we need a resolution fund paid for by financial institutions?
- When financial markets force too much austerity
- The MiFID Metamorphosis
- The Future of Retail Banking in Europe: Competition and regulatory challenges
- Regulatory Challenges for the EU Asset Management Industry
Editor's choice
-
Financial Markets
-
Politics and Institutions
-
Justice and Home Affairs
-
Economic Policy
-
EU Neighbourhood Policy
-
Economic Policy