MiFID and Reg NMS: A test-case for 'substituted compliance'?
This paper explores whether MiFID and Reg NMS could be accepted as equivalents by regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Apart from many similarities, the most important one being that the main purpose of both measures is to enforce best execution in equity trading, there are many differences as well in the definition of best execution, the structures of the markets, and the role and powers of supervisory authorities. It calls upon the European Commission to make a detailed comparison between both measures and to take the opportunity to negotiate a mutual recognition agreement with the US.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1522.pdf | 212.51 KB | 1177 | 6 days 22 hours ago |
This paper explores whether MiFID and Reg NMS could be accepted as equivalents by regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Apart from many similarities, the most important one being that the main purpose of both measures is to enforce best execution in equity trading, there are many differences as well in the definition of best execution, the structures of the markets, and the role and powers of supervisory authorities. It calls upon the European Commission to make a detailed comparison between both measures and to take the opportunity to negotiate a mutual recognition agreement with the US.
-en-1353
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 0 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => 7ca93e54f2c6d69b98b0a067a53050d0 [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [path] => book/mifid-and-reg-nms-test-case-substituted-compliance [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 8 [safe] => 8 [view] => 8 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1522 [safe] => 1522 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 8 [view] => 8 ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2007-07-13T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 13 July 2007 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => 295 [safe] => Array ( [nid] => 295 [title] => Karel Lannoo [status] => 1 ) [view] => Karel Lannoo ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [tags] => Array ( ) [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [taxonomy_term_5] => Array ( [title] => Financial Markets [href] => taxonomy/term/5 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => ) ) [taxonomy_term_106] => Array ( [title] => ECMI Policy Briefs [href] => catalog/106 [attributes] => Array ( [rel] => tag [title] => Produced by the European Capital Markets Institute, which is managed and staffed by CEPS, papers in this new series provide authoritative insights into ongoing regulatory initiatives that will alter the European financial landscape. ) ) ) [files] => Array ( [1337] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 1337 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1522.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1522.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 217606 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-14 12:02:19 [nid] => 1353 [vid] => 1353 [description] => 1522.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => [last_name] => [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 1353 [nid] => 1353 [container] => ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] =>This paper explores whether MiFID and Reg NMS could be accepted as equivalents by regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Apart from many similarities, the most important one being that the main purpose of both measures is to enforce best execution in equity trading, there are many differences as well in the definition of best execution, the structures of the markets, and the role and powers of supervisory authorities. It calls upon the European Commission to make a detailed comparison between both measures and to take the opportunity to negotiate a mutual recognition agreement with the US.
| Attachment | Size | Hits | Last download |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1522.pdf | 212.51 KB | 1177 | 6 days 22 hours ago |
This paper explores whether MiFID and Reg NMS could be accepted as equivalents by regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Apart from many similarities, the most important one being that the main purpose of both measures is to enforce best execution in equity trading, there are many differences as well in the definition of best execution, the structures of the markets, and the role and powers of supervisory authorities. It calls upon the European Commission to make a detailed comparison between both measures and to take the opportunity to negotiate a mutual recognition agreement with the US.
-en-1353
[list_price] => 0.00000 [cost] => 0.00000 [sell_price] => 12.00000 [weight] => 300 [weight_units] => g [length] => 0 [width] => 0 [height] => 0 [length_units] => cm [pkg_qty] => 0 [default_qty] => 1 [unique_hash] => 7ca93e54f2c6d69b98b0a067a53050d0 [ordering] => 0 [shippable] => 1 [path] => book/mifid-and-reg-nms-test-case-substituted-compliance [field_book_isbn] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_number] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 8 [safe] => 8 [view] => 8 ) ) [field_book_short_title] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [field_book_author_external] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => [safe] => ) ) [field_book_old_path] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 1522 [safe] => 1522 ) ) [field_book_pages] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 8 [view] => 8 ) ) [field_book_publication_date] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => 2007-07-13T00:00:00 [timezone] => Europe/Brussels [timezone_db] => Europe/Brussels [date_type] => date [view] => 13 July 2007 ) ) [field_book_author] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => 295 [safe] => Array ( [nid] => 295 [title] => Karel Lannoo [status] => 1 ) [view] => Karel Lannoo ) ) [field_image_cache] => Array ( [0] => ) [field_type] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [value] => BOOK [format] => [safe] =>BOOK
[view] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) [2] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [view] => ) ) [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [signup] => 0 [tags] => Array ( ) [uc_order_product_id] => [0] => [taxonomy] => Array ( [5] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 5 [vid] => 3 [name] => Financial Markets [description] => [weight] => 6 ) [106] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 106 [vid] => 4 [name] => ECMI Policy Briefs [description] => Produced by the European Capital Markets Institute, which is managed and staffed by CEPS, papers in this new series provide authoritative insights into ongoing regulatory initiatives that will alter the European financial landscape. [weight] => 0 ) ) [files] => Array ( [1337] => stdClass Object ( [fid] => 1337 [uid] => 1 [filename] => 1522.pdf [filepath] => files/book/1522.pdf [filemime] => application/pdf [filesize] => 217606 [status] => 1 [timestamp] => 2009-09-14 12:02:19 [nid] => 1353 [vid] => 1353 [description] => 1522.pdf [list] => 1 [weight] => 0 ) ) [flatrate] => Array ( ) [shipping_type] => small_package [shipping_address] => stdClass Object ( [first_name] => [last_name] => [company] => CEPS [phone] => +32 2 2293951 [street1] => place du Congres 1 [street2] => [city] => Brussels [zone] => 94 [postal_code] => 1000 [country] => 56 ) [usps] => Array ( [vid] => 1353 [nid] => 1353 [container] => ) [weightquote] => Array ( ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] => Array ( [print_links] => Array ( [#weight] => -101 [#suffix] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#title] => [#description] => [#printed] => 1 ) [display_price] => Array ( [#weight] => -10 [#access] => 1 [#value] =>BOOK
[#delta] => 0 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => [#children] => Printed book ) [1] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 1 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [2] => Array ( [#formatter] => default [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type_name] => book [#field_name] => field_type [#weight] => 2 [#theme] => text_formatter_default [#item] => Array ( [value] => [format] => [safe] => [#delta] => 2 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#theme_used] => 1 [#printed] => 1 [#type] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#suffix] => ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#single] => 1 [#attributes] => Array ( ) [#required] => [#parents] => Array ( ) [#tree] => [#context] => full [#page] => 1 [#field_name] => field_type [#title] => type [#access] => 1 [#label_display] => inline [#teaser] => [#node] => stdClass Object *RECURSION* [#type] => content_field [#children] => Printed book [#printed] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] =>| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1522.pdf | 212.51 KB |
This paper explores whether MiFID and Reg NMS could be accepted as equivalents by regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Apart from many similarities, the most important one being that the main purpose of both measures is to enforce best execution in equity trading, there are many differences as well in the definition of best execution, the structures of the markets, and the role and powers of supervisory authorities. It calls upon the European Commission to make a detailed comparison between both measures and to take the opportunity to negotiate a mutual recognition agreement with the US.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 1522.pdf | 212.51 KB |
This paper explores whether MiFID and Reg NMS could be accepted as equivalents by regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Apart from many similarities, the most important one being that the main purpose of both measures is to enforce best execution in equity trading, there are many differences as well in the definition of best execution, the structures of the markets, and the role and powers of supervisory authorities. It calls upon the European Commission to make a detailed comparison between both measures and to take the opportunity to negotiate a mutual recognition agreement with the US.
Related Publications
- Lending to Households in Europe (1995-2009): ECRI Statistical Package 2010
- Consumer Credit in Europe (1995-2009): ECRI Statistical Package 2010
- The bank stress tests: a work in progress
- Europe 2020 and the Financial System: Smaller is beautiful
- The role of politicians in inciting financial markets to attack the eurozone
- Do we need a resolution fund paid for by financial institutions?
- When financial markets force too much austerity
- The MiFID Metamorphosis
- The Future of Retail Banking in Europe: Competition and regulatory challenges
- Regulatory Challenges for the EU Asset Management Industry
Editor's choice
-
Financial Markets
-
Politics and Institutions
-
Justice and Home Affairs
-
Economic Policy
-
EU Neighbourhood Policy
-
Economic Policy